How Does a Servicer Project Costs for an Escrow Analysis?

Updated July 9, 2026 5 min read

Behind every escrow-driven payment change is a forecast — a servicer’s best estimate of what a full year of property taxes and insurance is going to cost, made months before most of those bills actually arrive.

The short answer

A servicer projects the coming year’s escrow costs mainly by starting with the most recent known tax and insurance amounts, then adjusting for any changes it’s already aware of, such as a new premium or a reassessed tax bill. That projection, divided across twelve months and combined with any shortage or surplus adjustment, becomes the new escrow portion of the mortgage payment.

Starting point: what was actually paid

The projection process usually begins by looking backward at the escrow account’s actual disbursement history over the past year — what was paid to the taxing authority, what was paid for homeowners insurance, and on what schedule. Recent actual payments are generally treated as the most reliable indicator of near-term costs, more so than older data from several years back.

Adjusting for known changes

From that baseline, the servicer factors in anything it already knows is changing. A renewal notice showing a new insurance premium, or a tax bill reflecting a new assessed value, gets incorporated directly. If no such notice has been received by the time the analysis runs, the servicer typically defaults to the most recent known figure, sometimes adjusted by a standard percentage to account for the strong likelihood that costs won’t stay perfectly flat.

Turning the projection into a monthly figure

Why the projection sometimes misses

A projection is still an estimate, not a promise of what bills will actually come in at. A tax rate that changes after the analysis runs, an insurance premium that jumps more than expected at renewal, or a new insurance requirement added mid-year can all cause the year’s actual costs to differ from what was projected — which is exactly why the difference between an escrow shortage and a straightforward payment increase matters, since both can appear on the following year’s statement.

What to weigh

Because a projection is built from the most current available information rather than perfect foresight, some drift between projected and actual costs each year is normal and expected, not necessarily a sign of an error. Reviewing the analysis statement against actual tax and insurance bills received over the year is the most direct way to understand how closely the two lined up.

The bottom line

An escrow analysis isn’t just an accounting exercise — it’s a forecast, built from recent history and whatever known changes are on the horizon. Understanding that forecasting logic makes the resulting payment change far less mysterious, even when the exact numbers involved shift from one year to the next.